Automakers in Detroit are preparing to present their case to the Trump administration, arguing that proposed changes to the North American trade agreement could lead to billions in losses and diminish their competitive edge against international competitors.
U.S. automotive companies continue to grapple with the substantial tariffs introduced by the administration last year, which include taxes on steel, aluminum, car components, and vehicles imported from Mexico and Canada. They contend that competitors from Japan, South Korea, and Europe benefit from lower tariff rates.
Currently, executives in the U.S. auto industry are apprehensive that upcoming proposals slated for discussions with Mexican trade officials next month could escalate costs even more.
A key issue for automakers is the demand from Washington that vehicles must contain a minimum of 50 percent U.S.-manufactured components to qualify for reduced tariffs, as reported by Reuters in May. This stipulation, along with a proposal to increase the total North American content requirement from 75 percent, would potentially impose an additional $2 billion in annual costs on each Detroit automaker, according to estimates from two companies.
These costs would be in addition to the expenses that automakers have already been facing due to various tariffs imposed since last year.
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative did not reply to a request for comment. Officials from the administration have indicated that their tariff actions are intended to encourage more investment and job creation in U.S. manufacturing.
General Motors anticipates that its tariff-related expenses will reach between $2.5 billion and $3.5 billion this year, potentially accounting for over 20 percent of its operating profit.
Ford Motor Company has estimated its net tariff impact to be around $1 billion this year.
Ford’s latest onshoring
In a clear indication of its commitment to domestic production, Ford announced on Wednesday that it will shift the manufacturing of Lincoln models for the U.S. market from China to American factories, citing the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration as a significant factor.
Ford’s CEO, Jim Farley, stated to Reuters that the company might have been caught off guard initially by the administration’s dedication to boosting U.S. auto production. However, he noted that Ford, which already produces a larger share of its U.S.-sold vehicles domestically compared to its Detroit competitors, has recognized the need for change.
“It became apparent to us very quickly, ‘Look, we need to make some adjustments here,’” he remarked.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expressed optimism that more automakers will follow in the footsteps of Ford and GM by relocating manufacturing operations to the United States.
“We collaborated to get it right,” Lutnick added.
U.S. and Mexican representatives are preparing for a fourth round of trade negotiations next month.
This week, Canadian trade officials have been meeting with their U.S. counterparts to prevent another wave of tariffs on Canada scheduled to go into effect next week.
Asian automakers’ advantages rankle
The American Automotive Policy Council, representing Ford, GM, and Jeep manufacturer Stellantis, referred Reuters to a statement made on June 30, indicating that U.S. automakers are at a disadvantage compared to Japanese, South Korean, and European manufacturers who export to the U.S. and face a flat 15 percent tariff.
GM’s CEO, Mary Barra, mentioned during a July earnings call that the company is determined to ensure that U.S. automakers can compete effectively given the tariff rates faced by their European, Japanese, and Korean counterparts.
One automotive executive from the U.S. remarked that President Trump was able to quickly secure agreements with Korea and Japan because those nations could advocate for their automakers as part of broader trade deals that emphasize national security, which U.S. automakers lack.
“We don’t have a president or a prime minister who can reach out to Trump on our behalf,” the executive noted.
Jennifer Safavian, president of Autos Drive America, a trade association for foreign automakers operating in the U.S. such as Toyota and Hyundai, emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade discussions for all manufacturers.
“Our American and North American-made vehicles incorporate a substantial amount of U.S. components, and international manufacturers are also suffering due to the current trade climate with Mexico and Canada,” Safavian stated in a release.
U.S. automakers currently face a tariff of approximately 25 percent on imports from Mexico and Canada, but vehicles with a greater proportion of U.S.-made content benefit from reduced tariff obligations.
General Motors informed Reuters that vehicles showcasing significant U.S. and North American content “should receive preferential treatment compared to those that do not,” and expressed encouragement regarding the administration’s progress in negotiations.
Stellantis shared that it is optimistic about the ongoing discussions and is collaborating with the three governments “to ensure that we can manufacture and market affordable vehicles across the region.”




